(no subject)
Oct. 10th, 2005 10:38 pmI just finished reading the entries of this website and for the life of me can't figure out where the frothing fundie jerks get off saying that Hurricane Katrina was God's retribution for New Orleans' sinful ways. The vast majority of the entries were about elderly, sick or poor people. Most of the entries contained the phrase "God Bless You" for the help they presumed to receive in retrieving their loved ones. Does that seem to anyone like the godless heathens were being punished for their sins? From what I read, the grandmothers and grandfathers who were too frail to mosey on down to the melee in the Superdome stayed in their homes out of hope, fear and lack of resources to evacuate. Do the heartless wretches think that an 87-year-old man on dialysis is going to hop in a car he hasn't owned for decades and sit in traffic on the I-10 for twelve to fourteen hours to go where? The papers printed the evacuation routes, but failed to list shelter locations.
Over and over, the impression came to me that nobody was in charge and nobody was communicating to the people on the ground (or in the water or on rooves as the case may be). One poor soul had a helicopter pass over four times without rescue after four or five days stranded. Along with devising effective communications systems for first responders, the government needs to ensure that they adequately communicate with people in catastrophe areas. A lot of the anger and looting might have been ameliorated by adequate communications. Go low tech and use walkie-talkies and bullhorns. Cell phone technology was not up to the task. Cell towers were down and nobody could get through. Anyone who has a cell phone could tell you that they are still problemmatical despite the claims of "Can you hear me now" reception being ubiquitous.
When is this country going to wake up and put people in charge who care about everyone, not just their wealthy buddies, again? In
aestrearaven's journal, she posted an article about how Gulf Coast companies and workers are being ignored in favor of out-of-state companies with connections to politicians. Those companies are hiring foreign workers instead of locals. The situation is sickening.
Over and over, the impression came to me that nobody was in charge and nobody was communicating to the people on the ground (or in the water or on rooves as the case may be). One poor soul had a helicopter pass over four times without rescue after four or five days stranded. Along with devising effective communications systems for first responders, the government needs to ensure that they adequately communicate with people in catastrophe areas. A lot of the anger and looting might have been ameliorated by adequate communications. Go low tech and use walkie-talkies and bullhorns. Cell phone technology was not up to the task. Cell towers were down and nobody could get through. Anyone who has a cell phone could tell you that they are still problemmatical despite the claims of "Can you hear me now" reception being ubiquitous.
When is this country going to wake up and put people in charge who care about everyone, not just their wealthy buddies, again? In
no subject
Date: 2005-10-11 04:32 am (UTC)Frothing fundies, reptilian righties (they of the "they all deserved Katrina 'cause they won't prepared for the apocalypse and/or they're all criminals, oh wait they're not, it's all the fault of the liberal media that we look like asses" idiocy) and moron presidents who want to "help" by making it easier for corporations to ripoff NOians all deserve to have their heads held under swamp water for a decidedly longish period of time.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-11 12:17 pm (UTC)sigh
Date: 2005-10-11 12:11 pm (UTC)I would really hope that Our Leaders learn from their mistakes and put changes in place that are effective and would actually work, rather than just wheel-spinning shows for the media.
And I wonder if the better governmental response to Rita was due to everyone learning from Katrina or if it was just because it was Texas that was threatened instead of Lousiana and Mississippi.
Yes, if God didn't want bigger hurricanes, He wouldn't have invented global warming.
It's really too bad this isn't a big election year. I think we'd have a major shake up if we picked a new president in a month, instead of a couple of years from now. I'm already designing "Remember Katrina" t-shirts to wear standing outside polling places.
Re: sigh
Date: 2005-10-14 02:57 am (UTC)...*snerk * *giggle* BWAHAHAHAHAA!!!!!
Ahem. Sorry. But the odds of Shrub, his friends in Cronyville, and any other elected officials actually learning anything are about those of my suddenly joining the Bolshoi Ballet as a principal dancer - and I'm 37 and (slightly) overweight with bad knees and only two years of ballet. Ain't gonna happen.
Re: sigh
Date: 2005-10-14 04:48 am (UTC)What happened to
Date: 2005-10-11 12:36 pm (UTC)Re: What happened to
Date: 2005-10-11 02:07 pm (UTC)You have read "small gods", right...?
Date: 2005-10-11 01:40 pm (UTC)It doesn't make it less sickening, though. Which it clearly is.
And what do you think the ones in Israel said?
Date: 2005-10-11 02:51 pm (UTC)Which goes to show that every fundie likes to interpret the random fluctuations of fortune and misfortune in the world to suit his own agenda. Why punish George Bush and not Mr. Sharon himself? And if god decided that Sharon is merely Bush's pawn (which would show that god is not too strong on contemporary politics, as Bush would rather have him follow the Road Map), then why not go directly for Bush? Burn the White House? Or maybe hit Texas, his home? No, he goes for NOLA. It's just a misfire. After all he did hurl Rita at Texas, a bit...
Those people are so used to bring the "word of god" to people they stopped noticing long ago that god is not speaking to them, and that no angel gave them certification for understanding god's word. All they understand is the voices in their own head.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-11 04:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-11 05:07 pm (UTC)The point was that the first responders had no reliable means of communications. They had become entirely too dependent upon cellular technology, which is like Swiss cheese on a good day. After September 11th, part of the recommendations by the 9/11 Committee included dealing with the communications problems. It's been four years and we are no better off today than we were then as evidenced by the problems Katrina wrought.
Sitting over here on this side of the lake, the radio stations that were broadcasting were not giving accurate or useful information. One guy who ended up staying with my neighbor down the street was told by the radio that the Sam's Club on Airline was an evacuation point. He checked out of his motel and walked down there. When he got there, he was told that the Sam's Club was a makeshift morgue and that he'd have to walk all the way to the Superdome for evacuation. Instead, he walked over to my neighbor's house and stayed there. No, the problem is that there was no one in charge AT ALL.
There was little that could be done about the flood waters and the wind. There was plenty that could have been done about evacuating the throngs of people at the dome and Convention Center. There was plenty that could have been done to get them food and water in the interim before evacuation.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-11 06:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-11 06:10 pm (UTC)Excuse me? Sorry, couldn't let this slide past. As wrong (wrong, wrong, wrong) as the fundies are, the act of interpreting what their god means isn't one of them. Anyone and everyone who believes in diety/dieties interprets signs, texts, and events in light of their beliefs, whether it be the big bad judeo-christian dude or Osiris/Hecate/etc.etc.
The fundie error is the insistence of imposition of their belief on others, not the belief itself.
People in charge who care? Again?
Date: 2005-10-11 07:53 pm (UTC)I'm not so sure that's possible. One doesn't make it in politics by being caring. The way to the top is by being a bastard willing to walk all over anyone and everyone.
All in all, the best thing to do is to take care of yourself. You can't count on others to do it.
Taking care of oneself
Date: 2005-10-11 08:09 pm (UTC)If, as you say, we've never had people in charge who care, maybe it's high time we started electing some.
Re: Taking care of oneself
Date: 2005-10-12 02:09 am (UTC)Being poor is not an excuse. Poverty is not a handicap in this instance. I have been poor. I am not rich now. (you've seen my van) If anything, poor people should be better at taking care of themselves due to their experience with living on a shoestring. I do know that's not necessarily the case, but that's largely due to the poor around here having a skewed idea of what basic necessities are.
As an example, I see people on public assistance shopping. They are easy to see here, they pay with blue cards. They buy pop when there is perfectly good water coming out of the faucet. They buy name-brand stuff when generic will do just fine. I see people using foodsamps who wear shoes that cost more than my entire outfit. I'm not saying these folks are scamming the system, I'm saying they have no concept of "basic".
Being poor is no picnic, but neither is it the end of the world.
Sick and infirm I could see needing help. However, there aren't that many.
I don't know that we've never had caring people in charge, I just can't think of any. Well, maybe colonel Hackworth. He genuinely cared for sodiers in his command. Perhaps that's why he didn't make general.
don't worry
Date: 2005-10-12 07:42 pm (UTC)Hrm... It makes one wonder, really...
Strange, really. I'm generally more cement-headed...