This is not about the fucking pope.
Apr. 19th, 2005 08:30 pmBoring chunk of domestic data: I got my thank-you cards for my wedding presents done today and will mail them tomorrow. A month isn't too horrible. I wrote nice things pertaining to each gift. I went to a wedding in December and still haven't gotten a thank-you card so I consider myself ahead of the game.
This week is shot to hell as far as getting anything done in the house. I'm spending time at mother-in-law's house making sure she takes her medicine after her surgery last week. I've been reading a lot and writing a bit to pass the time. I hate daytime TV so I don't watch anything while I'm there. I'd take the laptop, but all I have is Windblows loaded on that and I'm loathe to get going only to have it BSOD on me. I'm using a pencil and paper. Longhand is not the burden most people think it is. Transcribing my scribble-scratches may not be a picnic, but it's better than nothing.
I got a questionnaire from one of the conservative congresscritters from Louisiana. The questions were so horribly biased I had to write a letter explaining why I couldn't answer just yes or no to them. I mean really! "Do you support voluntary prayer in public schools?" Yes or no. If an individual wants to pray for a good grade (rather than study the way he or she is suppose to), I don't have a problem with it. I think the response they wanted to elicit was regarding group led prayers. Very wrong on so many levels. If you want to pray, you can do it individually or if you need to be in gangs to pray, do it at your church or home. These stupid fuckers never seem to get it.
The phone will shortly ring and I'll have to pick up my friend Nancy from class and take her home since her piece of shit car is continually on the fritz. At least it's a nice evening for a drive. The weather is stunningly beautiful. The air is cool and dry and I can hardly wait to get home and strip naked to enjoy the perfect temperature.
This week is shot to hell as far as getting anything done in the house. I'm spending time at mother-in-law's house making sure she takes her medicine after her surgery last week. I've been reading a lot and writing a bit to pass the time. I hate daytime TV so I don't watch anything while I'm there. I'd take the laptop, but all I have is Windblows loaded on that and I'm loathe to get going only to have it BSOD on me. I'm using a pencil and paper. Longhand is not the burden most people think it is. Transcribing my scribble-scratches may not be a picnic, but it's better than nothing.
I got a questionnaire from one of the conservative congresscritters from Louisiana. The questions were so horribly biased I had to write a letter explaining why I couldn't answer just yes or no to them. I mean really! "Do you support voluntary prayer in public schools?" Yes or no. If an individual wants to pray for a good grade (rather than study the way he or she is suppose to), I don't have a problem with it. I think the response they wanted to elicit was regarding group led prayers. Very wrong on so many levels. If you want to pray, you can do it individually or if you need to be in gangs to pray, do it at your church or home. These stupid fuckers never seem to get it.
The phone will shortly ring and I'll have to pick up my friend Nancy from class and take her home since her piece of shit car is continually on the fritz. At least it's a nice evening for a drive. The weather is stunningly beautiful. The air is cool and dry and I can hardly wait to get home and strip naked to enjoy the perfect temperature.
*sends positive vibes*
Date: 2005-04-20 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-20 02:15 am (UTC)It's still an issue because it's still not allowed.
Date: 2005-04-20 02:32 am (UTC)A large number of them are actually honest about this goal (look around the web for Dominionists).
A few are dishonest about this goal, pretending to cherish freedom "of" religion (which is supposed to include freedom _from_ religion).
But the vast majority are unwilling to examine too deeply the consequences of their support for the others. They like to believe that their "freedom of religion" is being denied because they can't have school prayers. They think only of the simple goal of being allowed to pray loudly in front of everyone.
They don't want to think about what happens once they've put their religion into every facet of society. They don't realize that freedom of religion will no longer exist.
We used to be the "land of the free". They are actively working against that ideal, all the while blaming everyone else for the decline of America.
Sometimes irony hurts everyone.
Can we bludgeon them with a tire irony?
Date: 2005-04-20 03:00 am (UTC)I'd love it if they would put aside their greed...
Date: 2005-04-20 03:14 am (UTC)But I'm pretty sure if it hasn't happened yet, it's not very likely.
Go ahead and LART them for freedom. ;-)
Re: It's still an issue because it's still not allowed.
Date: 2005-04-20 03:14 am (UTC)Personally as a Christian, spare me the name calling, I think prayer in schools is a big mistake that will smack some self-righteous so called Christians upside the head. Consider, a school district that has become predominately Muslim, Buddhist, Wiccan, whatever...doesn't matter, Let us just say non-christian and prayer in schools is the status quo. Who the heck do you think is going to scream bloody hell because "they ain't prayin' right".
So make your generalizations all you want about Christians and Conservatives but bear in mind they are simply not true. Sometimes they make you sound like an extremist.
Oh, yeah I own a gun and I am not a coward. Ask anyone that knows me. That said, sometimes irony does hurt everyone.
Once again reality bites you in the ass.
Date: 2005-04-20 03:54 am (UTC)It's about high time you so-called Christians and conservatives clean house, because these uber-conservative Christians are giving you a bad name.
Re: Once again reality bites you in the ass.
Date: 2005-04-20 04:27 am (UTC)You don't like being called a "so-called Christian"?
Date: 2005-04-20 04:44 am (UTC)Your scope of influence obviously includes your online discussions. How often have you shown your disapproval of "these issues"? I don't recall seeing you speak out against those things, though that could just be my memory. Got linkage?
Re: You don't like being called a "so-called Christian"?
Date: 2005-04-20 05:41 am (UTC)My postings in the last year or so has been sporadic until recently.
I have been having some health problems again and dealing with them takes up allot of my time and energy.
Neither was I.
Date: 2005-04-20 04:42 pm (UTC)Re: Neither was I.
Date: 2005-04-20 07:27 pm (UTC)Re: Once again reality bites you in the ass.
Date: 2005-04-20 03:43 pm (UTC)It's still an issue because it's still not allowed.
Date: 2005-04-20 04:39 am (UTC)spare me the name calling
Um, what name calling? I realize you want to start a fight, but you should at least stick to what I actually said if you want to look mature.
You calling other Christians "so called Christians" is verging on name calling, but that was _your_ comment. Not mine.
Which generalizations are "simply not true", and how do you prove that assertion?
Ah, reading your last paragraph I see that you are dragging stuff from one entry into another unrelated one. That's bad form, lab_rat. If you want to comment about the things discussed there, go there to do it. Don't confuse this thread.
Re: It's still an issue because it's still not allowed.
Date: 2005-04-20 05:36 am (UTC)So we are both correct. It is still an issue for both of these reasons. You can disagree, that is your right.
I do not want to pick a fight. I just know in the past you have called people names.
My use of so-called Christians was in a broad sense not aimed at any one person.
You do often make generalizations of Christians and Conservatives. I just need to read your past comments to know that.
As far as my last paragraph being "bad form", maybe so.
Is "bad form" in lj really going to upset me? Not at all. I try not to sweat the small stuff.
Spare me your name calling.
Date: 2005-04-20 09:18 pm (UTC)Sounds pretty stupid when someone else says it, right? Don't worry, name calling is just small stuff. Unlike deliberately confusing a discussion by bringing in unrelated comments. That's a serious impediment to having a rational discussion.
So don't sweat it, titmouse.
Re: Spare me your name calling.
Date: 2005-04-20 09:31 pm (UTC)Any name calling on my part was indeed wrong and uncalled for. For that, if I offended you I am sorry.
I won't sweat it. I have been called far more nasty and hurtful things.
Let's see, I have been called crip, cripple, spaz, spazoid, gimpy, little crooked girl...and others with words I prefer not to use.
Fire away. You are going to have to do much better than titmouse.
Not interested.
Date: 2005-04-20 09:43 pm (UTC)Re: Not interested.
Date: 2005-04-22 09:55 pm (UTC)seriously, you might just want to get the fuck over yourself.
See, lab_rat?
Date: 2005-04-22 11:19 pm (UTC)Sadly, wtftard is not even capable of understanding the insults, let alone the fact that he's been insulted. So it's not really worth bothering unless I'm just bored.
Re: See, lab_rat?
Date: 2005-04-22 11:24 pm (UTC)Seriously, you are monstrously deluded kiddo.
You happen to be the stupidest person I have ever had the displeasure of encountering. I've met some real hammers too, you just happen to take the cake due to your willful ignorance.
LOL!
Date: 2005-04-22 11:56 pm (UTC)Not allowed so much as flaunted.
Date: 2005-04-20 02:33 pm (UTC)The Founders put a certain structure in place called the Constitution to make this country as egalitarian as possible. I do not mind if people hold their scriptures above the law in their own personal lives, but it's wrong to do so from a Constitutional standpoint and require that everyone else accept their religion in secular settings.
You have made the point of why prayer shouldn't be in school by using the example of a school district that becomes predominantly Muslim, etc. Prayers to Allah would not be respectful of the Christian children in the same way that Christian prayers are not respectful of the Muslim or other religious children. Why don't you get behind what's right here?
Re: Not allowed so much as flaunted.
Date: 2005-04-20 03:47 pm (UTC)That escapes the current crop of hypocrites.
Date: 2005-04-20 04:20 pm (UTC)Re: That escapes the current crop of hypocrites.
Date: 2005-04-20 04:29 pm (UTC)Re: Not allowed so much as flaunted.
Date: 2005-04-20 07:35 pm (UTC)And yes, you are correct. I should get back into at least letter writing. That I can do.
Re: It's still an issue because it's still not allowed.
Date: 2005-04-20 03:41 pm (UTC)Not Cons, Neo-Cons.
Date: 2005-04-20 02:31 pm (UTC)Yay!
Date: 2005-04-20 04:44 pm (UTC)Re: It's still an issue because it's still not allowed.
Date: 2005-04-20 03:33 pm (UTC)Eventually?
Date: 2005-04-20 04:33 pm (UTC)Both believe that their version of a god is the only correct one and that their god has dictated a godly kingdom here on earth. Both will enforce their religious views made law to the point of killing those who don't conform. Both consider women chattel, to be seen and not heard, to work like dogs in the home and provide offspring. The one difference that I can see is that the fundamentalist Christian believes they have a biblical mandate to convert heathens (and anyone who doesn't believe the way they do is a heathen). I'm not aware of a similar evangelical requirement in Islam, and none of the Muslims I've known have ever mentioned it.
The fundamentalist Christian cannot live and let live, because of their view of a wrathful god. They honestly believe that their god will destroy them along with sinners should they not be successful in converting the whole lot of us.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-20 10:56 am (UTC)The weather here has been beautiful also. Makes it hard to go to my classes.
don't get me started
Date: 2005-04-20 01:40 pm (UTC)Re: don't get me started
Date: 2005-04-20 02:34 pm (UTC)Spin doctors in high places
Date: 2005-04-20 01:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-20 06:22 pm (UTC)I suppose some of Jason's kin think we are rude. There were some people that didn't get cards because we were too caught up in packing stuff for our move.
Did you have the gift that was challenging to find something nice to write about? I had at least 2 or 3 that I had to make up some little white lies, and at least one that I wasn't even sure what it was.
Actually, we got cool stuff all around.
Date: 2005-04-21 04:03 am (UTC)I printed a copy of my mailing list database and made notes next to each name whilst I opened the presents so I wouldn't have to try to remember. The whole wedding cost less than $1,000 inclusive of everything. I think it was $800 and something.
Your "thank you cards"
Date: 2005-04-20 07:42 pm (UTC)Good job! If I had fresh sugar cookies ou would get a dozen. Then you would have to write me a thank you note.Thank you notes in my family were required. That is OK I still practice that nicety today.
Gotta run to the gym.
The pope fucks?
Date: 2005-04-20 11:11 pm (UTC)Well done on the cards. It took us about 6 months to finally remember who brought what and thank them.
Put linux on the laptop! You've done it before and know what to expect. I recommend Ubuntu (or unga-bunga as my youngest daughter calls it). Nice simple and clean install and you end up with a Gnome-based GUI
It makes me angry to read that there have had to have been *laws* passed to prevent indoctrination in schools in the US. The kids over here get a taster into the theology of the "big three" plus some teachings of other religions throughout the world (unless they attend religion-based schools such as RC). When I was at school we used to sing hymns at assembly. That went out of the window with the huge influx of muslims into the area who's parents complained quite rightly that their kids had their own religion thank you very much and having them come home singing "onward christian soldiers" was bang out of order. I believe that faith is such an abstract concept that it should not be taught until a person reaches adulthood and (at least in theory) has a chance to reason it out for themselves. Indoctrinating schoolkids who's minds are still being shaped seems sick.
Stripping naked over here aint such a good idea ATM - it's still too bloody cold! However the warmer months are approaching and I will soon be able to show my arse and scare the neighbours again :o)
Re: The pope fucks?
Date: 2005-04-21 04:06 am (UTC)If I load Linux on my laptop, it will probably be Mandrake since that's the distro I'm using on all my other machines. I might venture into Ubuntu eventually. For now, I'm really liking Mandrake a lot.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-23 05:45 pm (UTC)